
Canada's GST Holiday and Rebate Cheques: Economic Relief or Inflation Risk?
OTTAWA, Canada, November 22, 2024 – The Government of Canada has provided $6.3 billion in overall assistance to alleviate citizen pressures on the cost of living. A temporary suspension of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on certain items and the issuance of 250 discount cheques to approximately 18.7 million Canadians early in 2025 are essential to this initiative.
The GST holiday, scheduled for December 14 to February 15, will exempt items such as toys, diapers, snacks, restaurant meals and alcoholic beverages from federal sales tax. This measure is expected to provide $1.6 billion in tax relief. In addition, Canadians who worked in 2023 and earned up to $150,000 are eligible for the $250 rebate, collectively adding $4.7 billion in direct payments.
Economists have expressed mixed reactions to these measures. Doug Porter, Chief Economist of the Bank of Montreal, highlighted the substantial nature of the rebate cheques, suggesting that they may have a greater impact on consumer spending than on GST leave. He noted that while these initiatives could increase revenues and expenditures, they reached a time when inflation had been moderate, which could complicate the Bank of Canada’s monetary policy decisions.
Provincial leaders expressed concern about the impact of the GST suspension on their income. The first in New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Quebec highlighted potential losses of sales tax revenues and sought compensation from the federal government. Quebec’s Finance Minister, Eric Girard, said that without the federal rebate, the province would not be in line with the tax reduction, highlighting the financial challenges posed by the federal initiative.
Critics argue that relief measures may not adequately address the needs of vulnerable populations. Older people and people with fixed incomes, who are not eligible for billing checks, have expressed a sense of exclusion. Neil Pierce, a 69-year-old Edmonton resident, described cheques as a ”political payment,” fearing that retirees would be neglected in government relief efforts.
As the federal government moves forward with these measures, the balance between immediate economic relief and long-term financial health management remains a point of discussion between policy makers and stakeholders.