
House Republicans Urge Day-One Elimination of IRS Direct File Program | Image Source: Images.pexels.com
WASHINGTON, D.C., 10 December 2024 – Representative Adrian Smith (R-NE) and representative Chuck Edwards (R-NC), along with 27 Congress colleagues, asked President Trump to immediately terminate the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) pilot program when he took office in January. In an official letter, legislators called for swift action to put an end to the programme, citing concerns about excessive government involvement and fiscal inefficiency. The letter was also sent to key members of the administration, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and the candidate for the Office of Management and Budget Russell Vought.
Critics of the Direct File Pilot program argue that it represents an unjustified expansion of IRS authority. According to the letter, the implementation of the program by the Biden administration, funded by the $80 billion allocation of the Inflation Reduction Act to the IRS, led to what legislators have called “structural effects” and “mismanagement”. He stressed that taxpayers should not be forced to adopt a system that could compromise their freedom and privacy.
The opposition of legislators to the Direct Archives stems from broader concerns about the role of the IRS in tax preparation. The letter underscores the concern that the extension of the IRS’s responsibilities would result in conflicts of interest, as the organization would simultaneously prepare and execute tax files. “It is a deeply disturbing and clear conflict of interest,” said the legislators, stressing further the lack of confidence in the impartiality of the agency, in particular in the light of previous allegations of politically motivated audits.
In addition to its perceived scope, the operational issues of the pilot programme were also discussed. The legislators mentioned the history of significant delays in the processing of income tax returns, particularly during the administration of Biden. They argued that the organization should focus on its main inefficiencies rather than new initiatives. “Instead of a direct file, the IRS should focus on improving its functionality and service to U.S. taxpayers,” he said, noting that many taxpayers have experienced long wait times for refunds under the current administration.
Representative Smith and his colleagues opposed the recent expansion of the IRS. Early this year, Smith and Edwards introduced legislation to end the Direct File program. In addition, Smith led efforts to repeal the $80 billion increase in IRS funding under the Inflation Reduction Act. Both initiatives reflect broader Republican momentum to reduce what they perceive as excessive government spending and authority.
Supporters of the elimination of direct files argue that the program undermines competition in the tax preparation industry. They argue that the entry of IRS into space could stifle private sector innovation, forcing taxpayers to adopt a government-controlled system with fewer options. The letter concludes by urging the new administration to take immediate action to repeal the program, defining it as a necessary measure to protect taxpayers’ freedoms and restore confidence in federal agencies.
The Biden administration had already defended the Direct File Pilot Program as a means of simplifying tax returns for low- and middle-income taxpayers. However, the controversy surrounding its implementation and potential expansion highlights the challenges of balancing effectiveness, privacy and accountability in federal fiscal policy. The decision on the future of the agenda now rests with the administration that is to deal with this item at the beginning of its mandate.