SEC Penalizes Deutsche Bank Securities for Untimely SAR Filings | Image Source: Www.bnnbloomberg.ca
WASHINGTON, D.C., December 20, 2024 - The Securities and Changes Commission (SEC) has announced implementation measures against Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (DBSI) for significant deficiencies in the suspicious activity reporting (SAR). These violations, which range from April 2019 to March 2024, highlight critical deficiencies in the implementation of the ESA Banking Secrets Act (BSA) and related regulations.
According to the SEC’s findings, DBSI, a registered broker and investment advisor, delayed the presentation of the RAD on transactions deemed potentially suspicious under the RAD rule. Under this rule, intermediaries must submit such reports within 30 to 60 days of the detection of activities likely to result in illegality of funds, avoidance of financial regulations or transactions that have no legal purpose. However, DBSI has repeatedly exceeded these deadlines, sometimes delaying search and rescue films by more than two years.
The SEC case against Deutsche’s bank securities
The SEC found that DBSI’s internal anti-money laundering policies were insufficient to ensure that SAR requests were submitted in a timely manner. A central problem is the lack of clear timelines for police and regulatory investigations. Although the DBSI Financial Crime Operations (FCO) team was tasked with submitting search and rescue within 60 days, cases of external citations were often outside this structured framework. These procedural deficiencies resulted in unreasonable delays, as some SARs experienced months or years after the initial detection of suspicious activities.
ESA Chair Gary Gensler highlighted the importance of timely reporting to protect the integrity of the marketplace. He noted that delays in reporting not only violated legal mandates, but also prevented regulatory and enforcement efforts to combat financial offences. The sanctions imposed reflect the SEC’s commitment to ensure strict compliance with the MAL and BSA rules.
Regulatory deficiencies and major violations
The SEC has detailed many cases where DBSI did not respond quickly to requests for public information or regulation, leading to quick SAR films. For example, a report, triggered by a regulatory order, took almost nine months to be submitted. In other cases, SARS related to law enforcement investigations was delayed for more than two years, despite available evidence of suspicious financial activities.
The investigation revealed that DBSI’s compliance framework for AML did not set reasonable timelines for the fight against financial crime (FAC), which reviewed external requests. As a result, the major search and rescue investigations were not initiated or completed within an acceptable time frame, thereby compromising the effectiveness of the regulatory system.
Impact on financial institutions
The SEC Order imposes significant corrective measures on the DSI, including improved compliance policies and mandatory review of past SAR records. The company should also put in place stricter internal controls and organize regular training programmes for its staff to prevent future violations. In addition, DBSI is required to pay civil penalties, although some financial details have not yet been disclosed.
This case highlights the increasing regulatory review of financial institutions’ compliance with ETA legislation. The SEC has repeatedly stressed that sound SAR policies are essential to identify and mitigate the risks associated with illicit financial activities. Industry experts anticipate that this could lead to more stringent implementation measures across the sector, with a greater emphasis on timely reporting requirements.
Lessons for the financial sector
The case of DBSI serves as a precautionary account for other financial sector companies. The ESA stressed its position of zero tolerance in the face of non-compliance, particularly in the areas of national and global financial security. Companies are urged to regularly review their MLA policies, invest in advanced surveillance systems, and promote a culture of accountability to ensure compliance with search and rescue reporting requirements.
As regulators such as the ESA and the Financial Crime Enforcement Network (FinCEN) continue to prioritize compliance with the ETA, financial institutions must actively address the gaps in their processes. Improved coordination between compliance teams and external regulators is also essential to detect and report suspicious activities in a timely manner.
The SEC’s enforcement action against DBSI recalls the strong involvement in maintaining compliance. Financial institutions should consider these regulations not only as legal obligations, but also as fundamental elements of their role in defending market integrity and public confidence.
About The Author
