U.S. Farmers Face Trade Shake-Up as USDA Shifts Focus | Image Source: www.aginfo.net
WASHINGTON, D.C., April 7, 2025 – While the U.S. agricultural trade deficit exceeds $50 billion, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is looking at a new aggressive strategy. Led by Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins, this approach combines international diplomacy, targeted investment and re-launching trade programs to boost U.S. exports, especially as relations with key trading partners such as China are increasingly tense.
Why is USDA changing its business strategy?
The USDA change is rooted in the urgent economy. After years of diplomatic stagnation in the world market, the deficit has increased, putting pressure on American farmers. According to USDA, past policies have left US producers without the necessary commercial support to compete internationally. Secretary Rollins made this clear: her administration aims to change the narrative by actively seeking new business opportunities and reactivating existing ones.
“President Trump and I are not on the sidelines – we are actively working to open up new markets and remove existing barriers,” said Rollins at a recent press conference. “We put farmers first. These programs are a crucial step in sustaining sustainable economic growth in rural America. »
Which countries will be targeted by Secretary Rollins’ trade mission?
Rollins plans to visit six international markets during the year: Vietnam, Japan, India, Peru, Brazil and the United Kingdom. Each country offers strategic value, from Vietnam’s growing demand for protein to the United Kingdom’s appetite after Brexit for diversified imports. These missions are not only photographic operations, but are aimed at directly addressing commercial bottlenecks, such as technical export restrictions and outdated certifications, while promoting American agricultural products in person.
These trips come at a time when global food systems are more interconnected than ever. India’s growing middle class, Brazil’s dual role as a competitor and partner in Japan’s exports and high food security standards represent equal opportunities and barriers. By appearing in person, Rollins hopes to restore confidence, sign new agreements and make American products more attractive to international buyers.
How does China affect beef exports?
While the USDA is looking for greener pastures, the agricultural relationship between the United States and China is stressed. Recently, China has allowed hundreds of American meat establishments to exhale critical export records, effectively shutting the door off a considerable portion of American meat exports… Time couldn’t be worse… Beef producers have just regained momentum in the Chinese market after VOCID.
The expired entries, which expired on 16 March, have not been renewed for beef, although the entries for pigs and poultry have been updated. This selective renewal, together with further tariff increases on American meat, indicates a possible change in Chinese import policy. As Agribusiness Update noted, this movement has led to a sharp decline in U.S. beef sales to China, another blow to the already stressed sector.
“It’s not just about politics, it’s about livelihoods. Ranchers in the Mid West is looking for more buyers for millions of pounds of meat,” said a business analyst who closely follows the relationship between the United States and Asia.
What are the new USDA programs and how do they help?
In addition to international visits, USDA is implementing several export market development programs for fiscal year 2026. These include:
- Market Access Program (MAP): Funded at $200 million annually, MAP supports promotional activities for U.S. agricultural goods abroad. Participants typically provide $2.50 for every $1 in federal support.
- Foreign Market Development Program (FMD): With $34.5 million annually, FMD focuses on long-term strategic trade barriers and expanding markets for bulk commodities.
- Technical Assistance for Specialty Crops (TASC): A $9 million initiative that helps eliminate technical hurdles to exporting U.S. specialty crops.
- Emerging Markets Program (EMP): Provides $8 million annually to identify and develop opportunities in under-tapped markets.
The four programs are managed through the USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), building on public-private partnerships with non-profit commercial groups, government agencies and agricultural cooperatives. According to MyChesCo, the application window for these programs closed on June 6, 2025.
How can US farmers benefit from these initiatives?
These programs are not just cheque writing exercises. They are structured to match federal dollars to private investment, ensuring skin in the game for all participants. Farmers and farmers benefit from subsidized marketing campaigns, access to know-how and facilitating access to previously difficult foreign markets.
Think of a small almond tree in California trying to get its product on the shelves of the Tokyo store or a soybean grower in Missouri, India. These programmes finance market advertising, translation of promotional material, logistical support and even training of staff, as well as knowledge of export machines.
Does the avian influenza epidemic affect food prices?
Yes, and not just marginally. The avian influenza epidemic in 2025 has already made more than 20 million commercial hens that kill eggs, creating a tooth visible in the national egg supply. As a temporary solution, industry leaders have introduced the idea of reorienting eggs from excess broods (usually intended for feed or animal disposal) into the fresh egg market. This strategy could alleviate supply constraints slightly and lower retail prices.
“It’s an unorthodox approach, but it could provide some space to breathe for consumers and producers,” said a senior analyst of an American poultry exchange group.
As Agrimarketing.com reported, this adaptation highlights the broader theme of 2025: agility. Whether it involves changing trade strategies or reorganizing supply chains, industry has to cope with global and domestic pressures.
What role do public and private associations play in this commercial restart?
These USDA trade programmes are largely dependent on concerted implementation. Not-for-profit organizations, regional councils and private agro-industry are not just stakeholders, they are key players. According to USDA, this framework ensures that funds are allocated to initiatives with proven market knowledge, experience and capacity in the field.
This synergy makes it possible to better adapt awareness strategies. A single WFP initiative could involve the California Aguacat Commission in London, while a FMD-supported mission could fund research on rice export potential in West Africa. These are not cookie storage approaches, they are strategic, locally adapted and results-oriented.
Where does it leave the average American farmer?
At a crossing. On the one hand, American agriculture faces undeniable challenges: from China’s demand for cooling to epidemics and rising entry costs. On the other hand, new doors are opening. If effectively implemented, USDA business missions and funding initiatives could rebalance the rules of the game, giving farmers access to markets that were once out of reach.
But this optimism comes with a warning: implementation is everything. The success of these programmes depends on clear communication, effective implementation processes and ongoing evaluation to ensure that results are consistent with rhetoric.
Ultimately, farmers do not need promises, they need pipelines. And that’s what the USDA wants to offer.
The next few months will tell you. Can US trade delegations reduce bureaucracy abroad? Will the new funding mechanisms affect the most needed family farms? And perhaps the most important – will American agriculture regain its competitive edge on the world stage?
These responses, for the time being, remain in the hands of policy makers, trading partners and the unpredictable abyss and flows of global markets.
About The Author
